Having successfully obtained a financial order following divorce or dissolution of a civil partnership, this does not necessarily represent the end of the road. This is because further legal action may still need to be taken to enforce that order. This can sometimes be the case, even if the order was reached on mutually agreeable terms, where the reality of the financially stronger spouse or civil partner having to part with any money or assets may be causing some delay. Below we look at what can be done to remedy this problem.

How can a financial order be enforced?

In most cases, once the court has either made or approved an order as to how the matrimonial or partnership finances are to be split, the relevant payments or property transfers will be made in accordance with the terms of that order — and the parties can move on. Sadly, however, in some instances, the paying party will simply refuse to part with the money or assets which they are due to pay or transfer to their ex.

Fortunately, there are a number of ways of legally addressing a refusal to pay up, where the courts have various robust powers to ensure compliance with any financial order made. This will be the case even if an order was agreed by consent, provided it was put before a judge for the court’s approval, in this way making that consent order legally enforceable.

The potential routes available to enforce the party in default to comply with a financial order can include a charging order, an attachment of earnings order, a third party debt order, a warrant of control, or various orders relating to the sale or transfer of property.

Which option is best to enforce a financial order?

When it comes to enforcing a financial order, the best available option will depend on both the nature of the order and the sums involved. In cases where a large lump sum payment is due, the court can be asked to secure the money owed by placing a charge over any property owned by the defaulting party. This is known as a charging order. This is like having a mortgage in favour of the non-defaulting party, where an order for sale can subsequently be sought if the money is still not forthcoming. In contrast, where spousal maintenance has not been paid, an attachment of earnings order can be sought, requiring the employer of the defaulting party to deduct this money directly from their wages.

Other enforcement options can include a third party debt order, asking the court to seize money, usually held in a bank account in the name of the defaulting party, in full or partial settlement of the sums owed; a warrant of control, asking the court bailiffs to seize and auction off any goods belonging to the defaulting party; and, in the context of property adjustment orders, an order for the defaulting party still living in the property to leave and/or for the court to sign the relevant papers where the defaulting party refuses to do so.

Importantly, even though there will be a cost to taking proceedings to enforce a financial order, it is usually possible to ask the court to add these costs to the money owed so that reimbursement can also be claimed from a former spouse or civil partner.

Legal disclaimer

The matters contained herein are intended to be for general information purposes only. This blog does not constitute legal advice, nor is it a complete or authoritative statement of the law in England and Wales and should not be treated as such. Whilst every effort is made to ensure that the information is correct, no warranty, either express or implied, is given as to its’ accuracy, and no liability is accepted for any errors or omissions. Before acting on any of the information contained herein, expert advice should be sought.